On April 17, the Trump administration announced exemptions for American, Canadian, and certain foreign vessels from newly introduced port fees that apply to ships built in China. This decision addresses industry concerns over rising operational costs that could hinder U.S. exports and raise consumer prices.
According to the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), the revised policy is a softened version of the February proposal, which suggested fees of up to $1.5 million per Chinese-built ship. The new rules provide exemptions for vessels operating on inland U.S. routes, serving the Caribbean and U.S. territories, as well as empty vessels entering U.S. ports to pick up export cargoes.
Special provisions have also been made for LNG carriers, which must gradually increase their use of U.S.-built, flagged, and operated vessels—reaching 15% by 2047. Instead of a fixed charge, the port fee will now be calculated based on net tonnage or the number of unloaded containers.
The rate for China-built ships is set at $50 per net ton, with annual increases over the next three years. China-built vessels owned by non-Chinese companies will be charged $18 per ton, with smaller annual hikes. The fee will apply no more than six times per year per vessel.
Companies such as Matson, Seaboard Marine, and carriers in the Great Lakes will avoid new charges. However, major global shipping firms, including MSC and Maersk, warned that these fees could quickly escalate.
Meanwhile, China COSCO Shipping criticized the measures, claiming they distort fair competition and threaten global logistics stability. On the other hand, U.S. labor unions praised the move, viewing it as a step toward revitalizing domestic shipbuilding and enhancing economic security.
The USTR also announced upcoming hearings on additional tariffs, including 100% duties on Chinese-made port cranes and chassis components—areas dominated by Chinese manufacturing.
This announcement coincides with the anniversary of a U.S. investigation into China’s maritime practices and reflects a rare bipartisan consensus in Congress on the need to support American shipbuilding and maritime readiness.
